Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Otolaryngol...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Otolaryngology
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The efficacy of a personalised treatment depending on the characteristics of reflux at multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH monitoring in patients with acid, non‐acid and mixed laryngopharyngeal reflux

Authors: Jérôme R. Lechien; Francois Bobin; Vinciane Muls; Francois Mouawad; Didier Dequanter; Mihaela Horoi; Marie‐Paule Thill; +2 Authors

The efficacy of a personalised treatment depending on the characteristics of reflux at multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH monitoring in patients with acid, non‐acid and mixed laryngopharyngeal reflux

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the evolution of symptoms and findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients according to the type of reflux (acid, non‐acid, mixed and gastro‐oesophageal (GERD)).DesignProspective uncontrolled multicentre study.MethodsOne hundred and six patients with LPR have been recruited from 3 European Hospitals. According to the reflux characteristics at the impedance‐pH monitoring (acid, non‐acid, mixed, GERD), patients received a personalised treatment based on the association of diet, pantoprazole, alginate or magaldrate for 3 months. Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post‐treatment. Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) has been used to rate laryngeal and extra‐laryngeal findings at baseline and 12 weeks post‐treatment. Overall success rate and the evolution of symptoms and findings were evaluated according to the LPR types.ResultsOne hundred and two LPR patients (42 acid, 33 non‐acid, 27 mixed, including 49 with LPR and GERD) completed the study. RSS and RSA total scores significantly improved from baseline to post‐treatment time in acid, mixed and non‐acid groups. The presence of GERD in addition to LPR did not impact the clinical improvement. The 3‐month success rates of treatment ranged from 62% to 64%, and there were no significant differences between groups. The success rate of patients with non‐acid LPR was similar to those of patients with mixed and acid LPR.ConclusionMII‐pH is useful to specify the type of LPR and the related most adequate therapeutic regimen. Non‐acid or mixed LPR similarly respond to treatment than acid LPR but require a treatment based on alginate or magaldrate covering the non‐acid proximal reflux events.

Keywords

Male, Oto-rhino-laryngologie, Esophageal pH Monitoring, non-acid, Middle Aged, mixed, Severity of Illness Index, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, laryngopharyngeal, Belgium, Electric Impedance, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, Humans, acid, Female, reflux, France, Prospective Studies, Precision Medicine, laryngitis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!