
BackgroundPrevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in male survivors of cancer across cancer types has not been systematically analysed.AimTo estimate the prevalence of ED in all types of cancer and identify characteristics associated with ED in survivors of cancer.Design and settingSystematic review and meta-analysis (MA) of cross-sectional studies.MethodMEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched, targeting reports published from inception to 1 February 2020. All retrospective or prospective studies reporting prevalence of ED in male patients with cancer and using a validated tool for detection of ED were included. A random-effects MA model was used to pool prevalence of ED as absolute estimates at three different stages, that is, ‘healthy’, ‘at diagnosis’, and ‘after treatment’. A univariate MA regression including the three-level group variable as the only independent variable was used to assess the difference in ED prevalence across the three groups. Further MAs were conducted for studies involving patients at diagnosis and after treatment, and statistical inferences were made with setting for multiple testing controlling for a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05.ResultsIn total, 1301 studies were assessed for inclusion. Of these, 141 were potentially eligible and subsequently scrutinised in full text. Finally, 43 studies were included with a total of 13 148 participants. Overall, pooled data of the included studies showed an ED prevalence of 40.72% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.80 to 50.29) in patients with cancer, with prevalences of 28.60% (95% CI = 12.10 to 53.83) at time of diagnosis and 42.70% (95% CI = 32.97 to 53.03) after treatment, with significant difference between these two stages and across cancer locations, controlling for an FDR <0.05.ConclusionErectile dysfunction was particularly high in male survivors of cancer and was associated with cancer treatment, cancer site, and age.
Male, erectile dysfunction, prevalence, 610, Erectile Dysfunction* / epidemiology, systematic review, Erectile Dysfunction, Erectile dysfunction; Male cancer; Meta-analysis; Prevalence; Systematic review, Erectile Dysfunction* / etiology, Neoplasms, Prevalence, Humans, Prospective Studies, Survivors, Retrospective Studies, Research, erectile dysfunction; male cancer; meta-analysis; prevalence; systematic review., male cancer, meta-analysis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Neoplasms*, a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.-, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, cilt.71, 2021 [Pizzol D., Xiao T., Smith L., Sánchez G. F. L. , Garolla A., Parris C., Barnett Y., Ilie P. C. , Soysal P., Shin J. I. , et al., -Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in male survivors of cancer], systematic review.
Male, erectile dysfunction, prevalence, 610, Erectile Dysfunction* / epidemiology, systematic review, Erectile Dysfunction, Erectile dysfunction; Male cancer; Meta-analysis; Prevalence; Systematic review, Erectile Dysfunction* / etiology, Neoplasms, Prevalence, Humans, Prospective Studies, Survivors, Retrospective Studies, Research, erectile dysfunction; male cancer; meta-analysis; prevalence; systematic review., male cancer, meta-analysis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Neoplasms*, a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.-, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, cilt.71, 2021 [Pizzol D., Xiao T., Smith L., Sánchez G. F. L. , Garolla A., Parris C., Barnett Y., Ilie P. C. , Soysal P., Shin J. I. , et al., -Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in male survivors of cancer], systematic review.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
