
Summary: Parallel Genetic Algorithms (PGAs) have been traditionally used to extend the power of serial Genetic Algorithms (GAs), since they often can be tailored to provide a larger efficiency on complex search problems. In a PGA several sub-algorithms cooperate in parallel to solve the problem. This high-level definition has led to a considerable number of different implementations that preclude direct comparisons and knowledge exchange. To fill this gap we begin by providing a common framework for studying PGAs. We then analyze the importance of the synchronism in the migration step of various parallel distributed GAs. This implementation issue could affect the evaluation effort as well as could provoke some differences in the search time and speedup. We cover in this study a set of popular evolution schemes relating panmictic (steady-state or generational) and structured-population (cellular) GAs for the islands. We aim at extending existing results to structured-population GAs, and also to new problems. The evaluated PGAs demonstrate linear and even super-linear speedup when run in a cluster of workstations. They also show important numerical benefits if compared with their sequential versions. In addition, we always report lower search times for the asynchronous versions.
speedup, selection pressure, numeric performance, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, Parallel algorithms in computer science, asynchronous parallel GAs, cellular GAs
speedup, selection pressure, numeric performance, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, Parallel algorithms in computer science, asynchronous parallel GAs, cellular GAs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 114 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
