
doi: 10.1055/a-2238-4681
pmid: 38408592
AbstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) remains the leading cause of maternal mortality in pregnancy and the postpartum period. In addition to the higher pregnancy-associated baseline VTE risk, there are several well-established risk factors that can further increase the risk of VTE. At present, a thorough interrogation of these risk factors remains our only tool for estimating which pregnant people may be at an increased risk of VTE, and thus potentially benefit from thromboprophylaxis. However, an important knowledge gap still exists surrounding the duration of increased risk and the interaction of risk factors with each other. Furthermore, up to now, once significant risk has been established, prevention strategies have been largely based on expert opinion rather than high-quality data. Recent trials have successfully bridged a proportion of this knowledge gap; however, the challenge of conducting high-quality clinical trials with pregnant people remains. In this article, we provide an update on the recent evidence surrounding VTE risk factors in pregnancy while concurrently outlining knowledge gaps and current approaches to VTE prevention.
Evidence-Based Medicine, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular / prevention & control, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Anticoagulants, Venous Thromboembolism, Risk Assessment, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, 616, Humans, Female, Internal Medicine - Radboud University Medical Center, Venous Thromboembolism / prevention & control, Anticoagulants / therapeutic use, Venous Thromboembolism / etiology
Evidence-Based Medicine, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular / prevention & control, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Anticoagulants, Venous Thromboembolism, Risk Assessment, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, 616, Humans, Female, Internal Medicine - Radboud University Medical Center, Venous Thromboembolism / prevention & control, Anticoagulants / therapeutic use, Venous Thromboembolism / etiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
