
arXiv: 2508.14574
One of the main challenges in neural sign language production (SLP) lies in the high intra-class variability of signs, arising from signer morphology and stylistic variety in the training data. To improve robustness to such variations, we propose two enhancements to the standard Progressive Transformers (PT) architecture (Saunders et al., 2020). First, we encode poses using bone rotations in quaternion space and train with a geodesic loss to improve the accuracy and clarity of angular joint movements. Second, we introduce a contrastive loss to structure decoder embeddings by semantic similarity, using either gloss overlap or SBERT-based sentence similarity, aiming to filter out anatomical and stylistic features that do not convey relevant semantic information. On the Phoenix14T dataset, the contrastive loss alone yields a 16% improvement in Probability of Correct Keypoint over the PT baseline. When combined with quaternion-based pose encoding, the model achieves a 6% reduction in Mean Bone Angle Error. These results point to the benefit of incorporating skeletal structure modeling and semantically guided contrastive objectives on sign pose representations into the training of Transformer-based SLP models.
Machine Learning, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Deep Learning, Contrastive Learning, [INFO.INFO-CL] Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL], Sign Language Production, [INFO.INFO-LG] Computer Science [cs]/Machine Learning [cs.LG], Computation and Language, Pose Encoding, Computation and Language (cs.CL), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Machine Learning, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Deep Learning, Contrastive Learning, [INFO.INFO-CL] Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL], Sign Language Production, [INFO.INFO-LG] Computer Science [cs]/Machine Learning [cs.LG], Computation and Language, Pose Encoding, Computation and Language (cs.CL), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
