
Abstract Background Findings from original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have demonstrated the effectiveness of resistance training (RT) on markers of performance and health. However, the literature is inconsistent with regards to the dosage effects (frequency, intensity, time, type) of RT to maximize training-induced improvements. This is most likely due to moderating factors such as age, sex, and training status. Moreover, individuals with limited time to exercise or who lack motivation to perform RT are interested in the least amount of RT to improve physical fitness. Objectives The objective of this review was to investigate and identify lower than typically recommended RT dosages (i.e., shorter durations, lower volumes, and intensity activities) that can improve fitness components such as muscle strength and endurance for sedentary individuals or beginners not meeting the minimal recommendation of exercise. Methods Due to the broad research question involving different RT types, cohorts, and outcome measures (i.e., high heterogeneity), a narrative review was selected instead of a systematic meta-analysis approach. Results It seems that one weekly RT session is sufficient to induce strength gains in RT beginners with < 3 sets and loads below 50% of one-repetition maximum (1RM). With regards to the number of repetitions, the literature is controversial and some authors report that repetition to failure is key to achieve optimal adaptations, while other authors report similar adaptations with fewer repetitions. Additionally, higher intensity or heavier loads tend to provide superior results. With regards to the RT type, multi-joint exercises induce similar or even larger effects than single-joint exercises. Conclusion The least amount of RT that can be performed to improve physical fitness for beginners for at least the first 12 weeks is one weekly session at intensities below 50% 1RM, with < 3 sets per multi-joint exercise.
790, Exercise/physiology [MeSH] ; Muscle Strength/physiology [MeSH] ; Muscle, Skeletal/physiology [MeSH] ; Resistance Training/methods [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Review Article ; Physical Fitness [MeSH] ; Time Factors [MeSH], Time Factors, Physical Fitness, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2732; name=Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/558923925; name=Physical education and sports, Humans, Resistance Training, Review Article, Muscle Strength, Muscle, Skeletal, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3600/3612; name=Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Exercise
790, Exercise/physiology [MeSH] ; Muscle Strength/physiology [MeSH] ; Muscle, Skeletal/physiology [MeSH] ; Resistance Training/methods [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Review Article ; Physical Fitness [MeSH] ; Time Factors [MeSH], Time Factors, Physical Fitness, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2732; name=Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/558923925; name=Physical education and sports, Humans, Resistance Training, Review Article, Muscle Strength, Muscle, Skeletal, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3600/3612; name=Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Exercise
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
