
Abstract A relay attack is accomplished by simply relaying messages between a prover (e.g., an RFID tag) and a verifier (e.g., an RFID reader) with the goal of convincing the verifier of its close physical proximity to the prover. In almost all relay attack scenarios, the verifier essentially communicates with a prover that is outside the verifier's read-range. Relay attacks are notorious since they occur without the knowledge of the reader and/or tag, and has the potential to cause damage to honest parties (here, RFID reader and/or tag). Almost all means to address relay attacks in RFID systems to date are based on the proximity check idea that involves the measurement of message round trip times between tag and reader. With the speed of light at play, such measurements need not necessarily be accurate and could result in the false assumption of relay attack absence. Our review of published literature on approaches that use non-distance-based means to address relay attacks revealed ambient conditions' potential. We critically evaluate ambient conditions and develop a lightweight mutual authentication protocol that is based on magnetometer readings to address relay attacks.
RFID, Authentication, Relay attacks, Non-distance-bounding
RFID, Authentication, Relay attacks, Non-distance-bounding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
