
Abstract This work presents original results from a new experimental approach to Differential Object Marking (DOM) using customized Acceptability Judgment Tasks (AJTs) in varieties of Spanish (Iberian, Mexican, Peruvian, and River Plate) and Portuguese (Brazilian, European), together with data from Catalan varieties obtained with the same methodology, Differential object Marking in Romance: The third wave, 279–314. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter). We show that AJTs can be used to produce a fine-grained picture of similarities and contrasts in the variation of Ibero-Romance DOM along well-established prominence scales, such as the Extended Animacy Hierarchy. We also test a series of predictions from the literature for each variety. Although we find clear evidence for scalar effects, we question the explanatory potential of a finite set of categories on prominence scales, and we argue that in order to explain DOM in the varieties under investigation, the nature of such scales needs to be better understood.
3310 Linguistics and Language, LMZ Competence Centre Language and Medicine Zurich, 460 Spanish & Portuguese languages, 470 Latin & Italic languages, 410 Linguistics, 11361 Latin American Center Zurich, 450 Italian, Romanian & related languages, 800 Literature, rhetoric & criticism, 1203 Language and Linguistics, 440 French & related languages, 10103 Institute of Romance Studies, 11551 Zurich Center for Linguistics
3310 Linguistics and Language, LMZ Competence Centre Language and Medicine Zurich, 460 Spanish & Portuguese languages, 470 Latin & Italic languages, 410 Linguistics, 11361 Latin American Center Zurich, 450 Italian, Romanian & related languages, 800 Literature, rhetoric & criticism, 1203 Language and Linguistics, 440 French & related languages, 10103 Institute of Romance Studies, 11551 Zurich Center for Linguistics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
