
We propose two heuristics for the bipartite matching problem that are amenable to shared-memory parallelization. The first heuristic is very intriguing from parallelization perspective. It has no significant algorithmic synchronization overhead and no conflict resolution is needed across threads. We show that this heuristic has an approximation ratio of around 0.632. The second heuristic is designed to obtain a larger matching by employing the well-known Karp-Sipser heuristic on a judiciously chosen subgraph of the original graph. We show that the Karp-Sipser heuristic always finds a maximum cardinality matching in the chosen subgraph. Although the Karp-Sipser heuristic is hard to parallelize for general graphs, we exploit the structure of the selected subgraphs to propose a specialized implementation which demonstrates a very good scalability. Based on our experiments and theoretical evidence, we conjecture that this second heuristic obtains matchings with cardinality of at least 0.866 of the maximum cardinality. We discuss parallel implementations of the proposed heuristics on shared memory systems. Experimental results, for demonstrating speed-ups and verifying the theoretical results in practice, are provided.
graphs, Bipartite graph, [INFO.INFO-DC]Computer Science [cs]/Distributed, [MATH.MATH-PR] Mathematics [math]/Probability [math.PR], bipartite graphs, matching, [INFO.INFO-DS]Computer Science [cs]/Data Structures and Algorithms [cs.DS], [INFO.INFO-DS] Computer Science [cs]/Data Structures and Algorithms [cs.DS], cardinality matching, Parallel, randomized algorithm, 004, [MATH.MATH-PR]Mathematics [math]/Probability [math.PR], [MATH.MATH-CO] Mathematics [math]/Combinatorics [math.CO], [INFO.INFO-DM] Computer Science [cs]/Discrete Mathematics [cs.DM], shared memory, and Cluster Computing [cs.DC], [MATH.MATH-CO]Mathematics [math]/Combinatorics [math.CO], shared memory programming, [INFO.INFO-DC] Computer Science [cs]/Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing [cs.DC], approximation algorithm
graphs, Bipartite graph, [INFO.INFO-DC]Computer Science [cs]/Distributed, [MATH.MATH-PR] Mathematics [math]/Probability [math.PR], bipartite graphs, matching, [INFO.INFO-DS]Computer Science [cs]/Data Structures and Algorithms [cs.DS], [INFO.INFO-DS] Computer Science [cs]/Data Structures and Algorithms [cs.DS], cardinality matching, Parallel, randomized algorithm, 004, [MATH.MATH-PR]Mathematics [math]/Probability [math.PR], [MATH.MATH-CO] Mathematics [math]/Combinatorics [math.CO], [INFO.INFO-DM] Computer Science [cs]/Discrete Mathematics [cs.DM], shared memory, and Cluster Computing [cs.DC], [MATH.MATH-CO]Mathematics [math]/Combinatorics [math.CO], shared memory programming, [INFO.INFO-DC] Computer Science [cs]/Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing [cs.DC], approximation algorithm
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
