
Two studies, comprising training in phonological analogy and semantic analogy with pre‐ and post‐training assessments, were conducted to investigate whether young children made orthographic analogies in learning to read a nonalphabetic script, Chinese, as alphabetic readers do. Twenty Chinese first‐graders and 20 third‐graders participated in each of the studies. The results showed that not only the third‐graders, but also the first‐graders made phonological analogies by the phonetic (i.e. the orthographic component in a Chinese character that provides sound cues) and semantic analogies by the radical (i.e. the orthographic component that provides meaning cues). It was, therefore, suggested that the roles and functions of the phonetics and radicals could be taught explicitly in school from an early age to help improve children's reading skills.
Teaching - Methods, Male, China, Logic, Concept Formation - Physiology, Concept Formation, 370, Pattern Recognition, Verbal Learning - Physiology, Child Development, Phonetics, Analysis Of Variance, Humans, China - Ethnology, Child, Students, Visual - Physiology, Analysis of Variance, Teaching, Verbal Learning, Semantics, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Students - Psychology, Hong Kong, Pattern Recognition, Visual - Physiology, Female
Teaching - Methods, Male, China, Logic, Concept Formation - Physiology, Concept Formation, 370, Pattern Recognition, Verbal Learning - Physiology, Child Development, Phonetics, Analysis Of Variance, Humans, China - Ethnology, Child, Students, Visual - Physiology, Analysis of Variance, Teaching, Verbal Learning, Semantics, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Students - Psychology, Hong Kong, Pattern Recognition, Visual - Physiology, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
