
To fairly assess the performance of battery state of charge estimation algorithms, a standardized evaluation method is required. This paper expands on a previously proposed evaluation method by including a measurement of computational complexity. Since traditional complexity metrics, such as computation time, may vary across devices and over time, this paper proposes a specialized metric to categorize computational complexity: approximate operational effort (AOE). AOE is determined by running the algorithm and a standard mathematical and memory operation on a device such as a PC and normalizing run time based on these operations. AOE is measured on three different devices for four algorithms, and is shown to decrease the variability between devices from a factor of ten to less than four, which is sufficient to differentiate algorithm performance across devices. The algorithms are also deployed to a microcontroller to compare with the PC based complexity measurement.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
