
Recent work has broadened the scope of school effectiveness research to consider not only academic achievement but also other outcomes, especially college attendance. This literature has argued that high schools are an important determinant of college attendance, with some contending that high schools matter more for college attendance than for academic achievement. A separate branch of research has illustrated how place-based opportunities facilitate college attendance. We merge these two literatures by asking if schools’ geographic context can explain apparent variation in effectiveness among Wisconsin high schools. We find that geographic context explains nearly a third of the variance in traditional estimates of school effectiveness on college attendance, because factors like proximity to colleges are strongly associated with college attendance. Accounting for geography is therefore important in order not to overstate high schools’ role in higher education outcomes. In contrast, geographic context explains little of the variance in academic achievement growth. Thus, if high schools seem to matter more for college attendance than for academic achievement under traditional estimates, schools’ apparent importance for the two outcomes converge upon adjusting for differences in geographic context. Results are based on multilevel models applied to rich administrative data on every Wisconsin public high school entrant between 2006 and 2011.
bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Educational Sociology, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Inequality, Poverty, and Mobility, SocArXiv|Education|Higher Education, Inequality, Poverty, and Mobility, Higher Education, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Education, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology, SocArXiv|Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology, Sociology of Education, bepress|Education, Sociology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Sociology of Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Education|Higher Education, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Inequality and Stratification
bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Educational Sociology, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Inequality, Poverty, and Mobility, SocArXiv|Education|Higher Education, Inequality, Poverty, and Mobility, Higher Education, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Education, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology, SocArXiv|Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology, Sociology of Education, bepress|Education, Sociology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Sociology of Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Education|Higher Education, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Inequality and Stratification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
