Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) has been proved to offer an efficient communication scheme, leveraging an interesting robustness against packet losses. However, it suffers from a high computational complexity and some novel approaches, which follow the same idea, have been recently proposed. One of such solutions is Tunable Sparse Network Coding (TSNC), where only few packets are combined in each transmissions. The amount of data packets to be combined in each transmissions can be set from a density parameter/distribution, which could be eventually adapted. In this work we present an analytical model that captures the performance of SNC on an accurate way. We exploit an absorbing Markov process where the states are defined by the number of useful packets received by the decoder, i.e the decoding matrix rank, and the number of non-zero columns at such matrix. The model is validated by means of a thorough simulation campaign, and the difference between model and simulation is negligible. A mean square error less than $4 \cdot 10^{-4}$ in the worst cases. We also include in the comparison some of more general bounds that have been recently used, showing that their accuracy is rather poor. The proposed model would enable a more precise assessment of the behavior of sparse network coding techniques. The last results show that the proposed analytical model can be exploited by the TSNC techniques in order to select by the encoder the best density as the transmission evolves.
Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Communications
Computer Science - Networking and Internet Architecture, Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Absorbing Markov chain, Network coding, Random codes, Sparse matrices
Computer Science - Networking and Internet Architecture, Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Absorbing Markov chain, Network coding, Random codes, Sparse matrices
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 174 | |
| downloads | 114 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts