
It is well-known that the method of empirical likelihood can be employed to get sharper inferences on many functionals of the population distribution by making effective use of auxiliary information available in a nonparametric model. In this paper, we show that in the context of estimating a population density function, the modified kernel density estimator which makes use of the knowledge of auxiliary information does not sharpen our inferences on the population density function in the sense that the modified kernel density estimator is first order equivalent to the standard kernel density estimator which does not utilize auxiliary information.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
