
AbstractBidirectional human–machine interfaces involve commands from the central nervous system to an external device and feedback characterizing device state. Such feedback may be elicited by electrical stimulation of somatosensory nerves, where a task-relevant variable is encoded in stimulation amplitude or frequency. Recently, concurrent modulation in amplitude and frequency (multimodal encoding) was proposed. We hypothesized that feedback with multimodal encoding may effectively be processed by the central nervous system as two independent inputs encoded in amplitude and frequency, respectively, thereby increasing state estimate quality in accordance with maximum-likelihood estimation. Using an adaptation paradigm, we tested this hypothesis during a grasp force matching task where subjects received electrotactile feedback encoding instantaneous force in amplitude, frequency, or both, in addition to their natural force feedback. The results showed that adaptations in grasp force with multimodal encoding could be accurately predicted as the integration of three independent inputs according to maximum-likelihood estimation: amplitude modulated electrotactile feedback, frequency modulated electrotactile feedback, and natural force feedback (r2 = 0.73). These findings show that multimodal electrotactile feedback carries an intrinsic advantage for state estimation accuracy with respect to single-variable modulation and suggest that this scheme should be the preferred strategy for bidirectional human–machine interfaces with electrotactile feedback.
Likelihood Functions, Hand Strength, Science, Q, R, Touch/physiology, Article, Electric Stimulation, Feedback, Feedback, Sensory, Touch, Medicine, Humans, Hand Strength/physiology, Feedback, Sensory/physiology
Likelihood Functions, Hand Strength, Science, Q, R, Touch/physiology, Article, Electric Stimulation, Feedback, Feedback, Sensory, Touch, Medicine, Humans, Hand Strength/physiology, Feedback, Sensory/physiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
