
AbstractThere are many statistical software packages that automate the activities related to statistical data processing and visualization of results. Often the choice of a statistical package by consumers is a difficult process and it is necessary to compare different products in order to highlight the most appropriate. The selection of one or another statistical package should be based on clear criteria and be made in accordance with the objectives set by the researchers. In the present work, the criteria for comparing statistical packages are systematized into the three groups and applied to four packages.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
