Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Diabetic Foot Infection Classification System
Copyright policy )Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Diabetic Foot Infection Classification System
In this longitudinal study of 1666 persons with diabetes, there was an observed trend toward an increased risk for amputation (chi(2) test for trend, 108.0; P<.001), higher-level amputation (chi(2) test for trend, 113.3; P<.001), and lower extremity-related hospitalization (chi(2) test for trend, 118.6; P<.001) with increasing infection severity. The Infectious Diseases Society of America's foot infection classification system may be a useful tool for grading foot infections.
- University of Washington United States
- University of Mary United States
- Leiden University Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc Netherlands
- Texas A&M University United States
Male, Bacterial Infections/classification, Communicable Diseases, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Amputation, Surgical, Age Distribution, Medical, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Sex Distribution, Societies, Medical, Aged, Probability, Incidence, Bacterial Infections, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Diabetic Foot, Wound Infection, Diabetic Foot/classification, Female, Societies, Wound Infection/microbiology, Amputation/statistics & numerical data
Male, Bacterial Infections/classification, Communicable Diseases, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Amputation, Surgical, Age Distribution, Medical, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Sex Distribution, Societies, Medical, Aged, Probability, Incidence, Bacterial Infections, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Diabetic Foot, Wound Infection, Diabetic Foot/classification, Female, Societies, Wound Infection/microbiology, Amputation/statistics & numerical data
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).319 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!