
doi: 10.1257/jel.20241678
What is the most efficient way of designing incentives in an organization? Over the past five decades, agency theory has provided various answers to this crucial question. This line of research suggests that, depending on the organizational context, the optimal approach to providing incentives may involve either relying on collective compensations or, conversely, employing relative performance evaluations. In the first scenario, cooperation among agents is the key aspect of the organization. In the second, competition prevails. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of this extensive literature with the aim of understanding the conditions under which one or the other type of incentive schemes is more desirable for the principal of the organization. To this end, we use a flexible and versatile model capable of addressing a wide range of scenarios characterized by different technologies, information constraints, and behavioral norms. ( JEL C70, D62, D82, D83, D86, L12, M54)
JEL: M - Business Administration and Business Economics • Marketing • Accounting • Personnel Economics/M.M1 - Business Administration/M.M1.M12 - Personnel Management • Executives, Organizational design., 330, JEL: J - Labor and Demographic Economics/J.J3 - Wages, Organizational design, Teams, Competition vs. cooperation, and Uncertainty/D.D8.D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory, JEL: M - Business Administration and Business Economics • Marketing • Accounting • Personnel Economics/M.M5 - Personnel Economics/M.M5.M50 - General, Moral hazard, JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D2 - Production and Organizations/D.D2.D20 - General, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE, Executive Compensation, JEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L2 - Firm Objectives, Collusion, Tournaments, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D8 - Information, and Behavior/L.L2.L23 - Organization of Production, Free riding, Knowledge, Peer effects, Compensation, and Labor Costs/J.J3.J33 - Compensation Packages • Payment Methods, Incentive contracts, Organization
JEL: M - Business Administration and Business Economics • Marketing • Accounting • Personnel Economics/M.M1 - Business Administration/M.M1.M12 - Personnel Management • Executives, Organizational design., 330, JEL: J - Labor and Demographic Economics/J.J3 - Wages, Organizational design, Teams, Competition vs. cooperation, and Uncertainty/D.D8.D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory, JEL: M - Business Administration and Business Economics • Marketing • Accounting • Personnel Economics/M.M5 - Personnel Economics/M.M5.M50 - General, Moral hazard, JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D2 - Production and Organizations/D.D2.D20 - General, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE, Executive Compensation, JEL: L - Industrial Organization/L.L2 - Firm Objectives, Collusion, Tournaments, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D8 - Information, and Behavior/L.L2.L23 - Organization of Production, Free riding, Knowledge, Peer effects, Compensation, and Labor Costs/J.J3.J33 - Compensation Packages • Payment Methods, Incentive contracts, Organization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
