
Abstract Background The out-of-plane shear behavior of paperboards plays a critical role in converting processes such as creasing and folding. The recently proposed Split Double Cantilever Beam (SDCB) specimen has been used to characterize this behavior using a cohesive zone model, but its large size poses handling challenges. Objective This study aims to optimize the SDCB specimen configuration to improve manageability while maintaining the quality of experimental measurements. Methods A design of experiments (DOE) approach and finite element analysis incorporating a mixed-mode interface model were used to analyze the influence of key specimen parameters. Shear reaction force and rotation relative to shear deformation were assessed to guide the optimization. Results A redesigned SDCB specimen was identified, achieving a 40% reduction in size and weight (retaining 60% of the original dimensions) without compromising the experimental quality. The optimized configuration maintained comparable measurement accuracy to the original design. Conclusions The proposed SDCB specimen redesign offers a more manageable experimental setup, enhancing usability in experimental studies while preserving the reliability of shear behavior characterization.
Shear properties, Applied Mechanics, Teknisk mekanik, Paperboard, Fracture mechanics, Pappers-, massa- och fiberteknik, Paper, Pulp and Fiber Technology, Cohesive zone model
Shear properties, Applied Mechanics, Teknisk mekanik, Paperboard, Fracture mechanics, Pappers-, massa- och fiberteknik, Paper, Pulp and Fiber Technology, Cohesive zone model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
