
ABSTRACT: Evaluation of students is a vital component of any educational process and it is necessary to improve the performance. Viva voce is an integral part of assessment of medical student. It is of utmost importance to evaluate the tool used to assess the students so that the competencies aimed to achieve in the learner, can be determined. In this study we compared the results of structural viva with an unstructured one in Gross Anatomy. OBJECTIVE: Objective of this study is to compare the performance of 1st year medical students in structured viva of Gross Anatomy, in comparison to unstructured one. DESIGN: Observational trial MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anatomy viva was taken from first year MBBS students at ANMC, Islamabad by both structured and unstructured pattern. The domain selected to be tested were the nerves of upper limb. The specific pattern of structured and unstructured viva was formulated and results of both exams were analyzed and compared. The students were also asked for the feedback about the viva to assess the acceptability of the students. RESULTS: On comparing the results there was statistically significant difference comparing the results of a structured viva with the unstructured one. The result showed that structured viva increases the objectivity and reduces subjectivity in marking, plus the students were overall satisfied and felt structured viva better than the traditional one. CONCLUSION: The marks obtained by the students in conventional and structured viva showed that the structural viva is uniform and reliable method of assessment.
Structured viva, R, Medicine, Assessment tool, Traditional viva
Structured viva, R, Medicine, Assessment tool, Traditional viva
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
