
We propose a statistic to evaluate the goodness-of-fit where we used the empirical moment generating function and the moment generating function, from the considered information it found that the Gn statistic was different behavior according to the used model for the fitting. Its behavior was great or similar to the Pearson statistics, but it was exceeded for the K-S statistic, also for the evaluated statistic was not influential to the sample size.Proponemos una estadística para evaluar la bondad de ajuste, donde se emplearon las funciones generatrices de momentos muestral y poblacional; a partir de la información considerada se encontró que la estadística Gn tuvo un comportamiento diferente de acuerdo con el modelo usado para el ajuste. Su desempeño fue superior o igual a la estadística de Pearson, pero fue superada por la estadística de K-S; además, para la estadística evaluada no fue influyente el tamaño de la muestra.
Moment generating function, Statistics, Goodness-of-fit, Simulation, HA1-4737
Moment generating function, Statistics, Goodness-of-fit, Simulation, HA1-4737
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
