
This paper raises the question of the meaning of the imperative of «preserving the identity», usually taken for granted in the current debate of multiculturalism. The idea of culture, the very fact of present multiculturalism with its unique characteristics, the necessary requirements for dialogue, the ideas of integration and tolerance, and the legitimacy of the demand for universal recognition of cultures are to that end analysed. As a conclusion of this analysis a criticism of the usual approaches is made and some proposals are put forward: neither assimilation nor staunch conservation but integration; dialogue of course but first and foremost living together and collaboration; likewise tolerance and recognition but not indifference. In short, hybridization against cultural identity is proposed.
Cultural identity,intercultural dialogue, tolerance, recognition, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, B, B1-5802, Philosophy (General)
Cultural identity,intercultural dialogue, tolerance, recognition, Philosophy. Psychology. Religion, B, B1-5802, Philosophy (General)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
