Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Planta Daninhaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Planta Daninha
Article . 2007
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

Manejo de herbicidas na cultura da soja Roundup Ready® Herbicide management in Roundup Ready® soybean crop

Authors: F.A. Petter; S.O. Procópio; A. Cargnelutti Filho; A.L.L. Barroso; L.P. Pacheco;

Manejo de herbicidas na cultura da soja Roundup Ready® Herbicide management in Roundup Ready® soybean crop

Abstract

O trabalho objetivou avaliar a eficácia de diferentes sistemas de manejo de herbicidas no controle de plantas daninhas e no desenvolvimento e produtividade de diferentes cultivares de soja Roundup Ready®. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições, em esquema fatorial 5 x 5, sendo cinco sistemas de aplicação de herbicidas [(1) glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (241,8 g ha-1) 14 dias antes da semeadura (DAS), paraquat + diuron (400 + 200 g ha-1) no dia da semeadura e glyphosate (960 g ha-1) 35 dias após a emergência da cultura (DAE); (2) glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (241,8 g ha-1) aos 14 DAS, paraquat + diuron (400 + 200 g ha-1) no dia da semeadura e glyphosate (480 g ha-1) aos 17 DAE; (3) glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (241,8 g ha-1) aos 14 DAS e glyphosate (960 g ha-1) aos 35 DAE; (4) glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (241,8 g ha-1) aos 14 DAS e glyphosate (480 g ha-1) 17 dias após a emergência das plantas; e (5) testemunha - glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2,4-D (241,8 g ha-1) aos 14 DAS, sem aplicação de herbicidas em pós-emergência] combinados com cinco cultivares de soja RR® (M-SOY 8585, P98R91, Valiosa, CD 219 e TMG 108), formando 25 tratamentos. Todos os sistemas de aplicação de herbicidas apresentaram controle das espécies de plantas daninhas Chamaesyce hirta, Alternanthera tenella, Euphorbia heterophylla, Spermacoce latifolia e Tridax procumbens superior ao da testemunha sem aplicação de herbicidas em pós-emergência, sendo eficientes no controle dessas espécies. No entanto, no "sistema 3" observou-se menor nível de controle das espécies Spermacoce latifolia, Tridax procumbens e Chamaesyce hirta, esta última somente nas parcelas semeadas com o cultivar CD 219. Os sistemas de manejo de herbicidas influenciaram a altura das plantas de soja, sendo os menores valores verificados no cultivar TMG 108 com a aplicação do "sistema 3". A produtividade de grãos dos cultivares de soja não diferiu entre os sistemas de aplicação de herbicidas, porém todos resultaram em produtividade superior ao da testemunha. O cultivar TMG 108 apresentou maior produtividade de grãos em todos os sistemas de aplicação de herbicidas, inclusive nas parcelas da testemunha, mas não diferindo do cultivar P98R91, nos "sistemas 1, 3 e 4" de aplicação de herbicidas e na testemunha, e do cultivar M-SOY 8585, no "sistema 3".This study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of different herbicide management systems in weed control and the development and yield of different Roundup Ready® soybean cultivars. A randomized block experimental design with four replicates was used under a 5x5 factorial scheme, using five herbicide application systems: [(1) glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2.4-D (241.8 g ha-1) at 14 days before sowing (DAS), paraquat + diuron (400 + 200 g ha-1) at the sowing day, and glyphosate (960 g ha-1) at 35 days after crop emergence (DAE); (2) glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2.4-D (241.8 g ha-1) at 14 DAS, paraquat + diuron (400 + 200 g ha-1) at the sowing day, and glyphosate (480 g ha-1) 17 at DAE; (3) glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2.4-D (241.8 g ha-1) at 14 DAS, and glyphosate (960 g ha-1) at 35 DAE; (4) glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2.4-D (241.8 g ha-1) at 14 DAS and glyphosate (480 g ha-1) at 17 days after plant emergence; and (5) control - glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) + 2.4-D (241.8 g ha-1) at 14 DAS, without herbicide application at post-emergence] combined with five RR® soybean varieties (M-SOY 8585, P98R91, Valiosa, CD 219 and TMG 108),comprising 25 treatments. All herbicide application systems controlled the weed species Chamaesyce hirta, Alternanthera tenella, Euphorbia heterophylla, Spermacoce latifolia and Tridax procumbens. This control was superior to that without herbicide application at post-emergence, being thus efficient in controlling those species. "System 3" showed a lower control level of the species Spermacoce latifolia, Tridax procumbens and Chamaesyce hirta, the last one only in the plots sowed with the cultivar CD 219. Herbicide management systems affected the height of the soybean plants, with the lowest values being found for TMG108 cv. under "system 3" application. Although soybean grain yield did not differ among the herbicide application systems, all were superior to that of the control. TMG 108 cv. showed the highest grain yield in all the herbicide application systems even in the control plots; however, it did not differ from P98R91 cv. under the herbicide application "systems 1, 3 and 4 " and in the control, neither from M-SOY 8585 cv. under "system 3."

Keywords

plantas daninhas, glyphosate, Glycine max, QH301-705.5, QK1-989, weeds, Botany, Biology (General)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold