Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ DOAJarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
DOAJ
Article . 2017
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

BEEF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BALI AND WAGYU CATTLE

Authors: Ni Ketut Suwiti; Ni Nyoman Citra Susilawati; Ida Bagus Ngurah Swacita;

BEEF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BALI AND WAGYU CATTLE

Abstract

A research has been done in order to determine a physical characteristics i.e water holding capacity, acidity level (pH), and cooking loss of beef from bali and wagyu cattle which were sold in supermarkets around Denpasar. The sampels used in this study were 15 rib eye part of bali and 15 of the wagyu beef respectively, the sampels from both types were tested on the water holding capacity parameter, the acidity level, and cooking loss. The data were analyzed by qualitative descriptive analysis. The result showed that, the bali beef contained 66.13 % water holding capacity, 5.75 of acidity level and 31.74 % of coking loss, whereas the wagyu beef contained 63.84 % water holding capacity, 5.20 of acidity level and 32.29% of cooking loss.

Keywords

Veterinary medicine, SF600-1100

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze
Related to Research communities