
Administration Section Fisip Undip was one part of conducting both administrative and academic, so itwas expected to assist the implementation of Tri Dhanna of Higher Education to effectively and efficiently. The problems were believed to often occur in the administration Fisip Undip include the uneven work load, duplication / twinningfonn, the existence of role ambiguity The things that allegedly led to less optimal effectiveness of employee activity was Good work was less clear, so often overlapping, supervision was less intense and less than optimal and less communication were good, especially the external / with stakholder, then the problem was fonnulated "not optimal effectiveness of existing employees at the Administration Fisip Diponegoro University, Semarang" . The purpose of the studed to determine the effectiveness of employee activity, work procedures, supervision and administration section Fisip Undip communications and test the hypothesis among the variables. The theory used was the theory about the effectiveness of the Steers that the effectiveness of employee activity was the attitude or the general condition of someone who was positive about organizational life and there were 4 factors that also contribute to the final success of an organization including: organizational characteristics, environmental characteristics, worker characteristics, policies and management practices. The results showed that: The effectiveness of employees working in the administration Fisip Undip could say was good.
supervision, Political science (General), effectiveness of work, communication, work procedures, JA1-92
supervision, Political science (General), effectiveness of work, communication, work procedures, JA1-92
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
