Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao HAL Lumiere Lyon 2arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
HAL-ENS-LYON
Book . 2014
Data sources: HAL-ENS-LYON
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Digital Critical Editions

Exploring the interweaving of traditional and digital textual scholarship
Authors: Régnier, Philippe; Bélisle, Claire; Apollon, Daniel;

Digital Critical Editions

Abstract

Provocative yet sober, Digital Critical Editions examines how transitioning from print to a digital milieu deeply affects how scholars deal with the work of editing critical texts. On one hand, forces like changing technology and evolving reader expectations lead to the development of specific editorial products, while on the other hand, they threaten traditional forms of knowledge and methods of textual scholarship. Using the experiences of philologists, text critics, text encoders, scientific editors, and media analysts, Digital Critical Editions ranges from philology in ancient Alexandria to the vision of user-supported online critical editing, from peer-directed texts distributed to a few to community-edited products shaped by the many. The authors discuss the production and accessibility of documents, the emergence of tools used in scholarly work, new editing regimes, and how the readers' expectations evolve as they navigate digital texts. The goal: exploring questions such as, What kind of text is produced? Why is it produced in this particular way? Digital Critical Editions provides digital editors, researchers, readers, and technological actors with insights for addressing disruptions that arise from the clash of traditional and digital cultures, while also offering a practical roadmap for processing traditional texts and collections with today's state-of-the-art editing and research techniques thus addressing readers' new emerging reading habits.

Comment la transition de l'imprimé au numérique affecte-t-elle en profondeur la manière dont les philologues s'y prennent pour produire des éditions critiques adaptées à notre époque? Une hésitation se constate entre l'attachement aux méthodes traditionnelles et l'invention d'objectifs et de procédures résolument neuves. L'enjeu est, il est vrai, énorme, culturellement, scientifiquement, et économiquement: c'est toute la littérature des siècles passés qui est à retraiter en fonction de ce contexte desdites nouvelles technologies de l'information et de la communication, et c'est toute la chaîne de production des éditions critiques qui est affectée, quantitativement et qualitativement, depuis la collecte et l'encodage des textes jusqu'à leur mise en ligne sous des formes offrant des possibilités de présentation adaptées à chaque cas, et avec l'accompagnement d'outils de traitement des données textuelles qui sont autant de fonctionnalités nouvelles. La production (l'écriture) en est affectée aussi bien que la réception (la lecture). Les contributeurs essaient de ne laisser de côté aucune question technique ou épistémologique. Ils s'appuient sur de multiples exemples, choisis en différents pays et en différentes langues, pour faire le point sur les techniques, tracer les grandes lignes des évolutions en cours, et préconiser au passage quelques principes et quelques bonnes pratiques.

Country
France
Keywords

[SHS.LITT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Literature, "édition critique numérique", 791, "scholarly edition", "humanités numériques", [SHS.LITT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Literature, "digital critical editions", [SHS.MUSEO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology, "édition critique", "philologie", 930, "textual technologies", [SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!