
Pile-up and dead-time are two main causes of nonlinearity in the response of a PET scanner as a function of activity in the field of view (FOV). For a given scanner and acquisition system, pile-up effects depend on the material and size of the object being imaged and on the distribution of activity inside and outside the FOV, because these factors change the singles-to-coincidences ratio (SCR). Thus, it is difficult to devise an accurate correction that would be valid for any acquisition. In this work, we demonstrate a linear relationship between SCR and effective dead-time, which measures the effects of both dead-time (losses) and pile-up (gains and losses). This relationship allows us to propose a simple method to accurately estimate dead-time and pile-up corrections using only two calibration acquisitions with, respectively, a high and low SCR. The method has been tested with simulations and experimental data for two different scanner geometries: a scanner with large area detectors and no pile-up rejection, and a scanner composed of two full rings of smaller detectors. Our results show that the SCR correction method is accurate within 7%, even for high activities in the FOV, and avoids the bias of the standard single-parameter method. © 2013 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
This work was partially funded by AMIT project (CEN-20101014) from the CDTICENIT program, CIBERsam (CB07/09/0031), projects TEC2010-21619-C04-01 and TEC2011-28972-C02-01 from Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spanish Government (ENTEPRASE Grant, PSE-300000-2009-5), PRECISION grant IPT-300000- 2010-3, CPAN (CSD-2007-00042@Ingenio2010), MEC (FPA2010-17142) and ARTEMIS program (S2009/DPI-1802) from Spanish Comunidad de Madrid and EU-ERDF program.
Peer Reviewed
Positron emission tomography, Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Image quality, Non-ionizing radiation equipment and techniques, Biología y Biomedicina
Positron emission tomography, Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Image quality, Non-ionizing radiation equipment and techniques, Biología y Biomedicina
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
