Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Published as Diskussionsbeiträge der Scientists for Future 6 (2): 1–11. This is version 1.1 (English, published 12. Feb. 2021). Version 1.0 is an earlier German version (published 28. Jan. 2021 under doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4536573). SUMMARY: Natural gas can no longer be considered a bridge technology to a fossil-free future. The assumption that natural gas is more favorable than coal as an energy source with regards to its climate impact must be revised. The planned expansion of natural gas infrastructure in Germany is not justifiable in terms of climate policy, not compatible with Germany’s goals to meet the Paris climate accord, and even entails numerous financial risks. Moreover, it will delay the planned energy transition.
Volume 6 (2) of "Diskussionsbeiträge der Scientists for Future". This is the English translation of the version 1.0, "Ausbau der Erdgas-Infrastruktur: Brückentechnologie oder Risiko für die Energiewende? (Version 1.0, Deutsch)", http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4474498
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 62 | |
| downloads | 34 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts