Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Normalisation of Early Modern Science: Digitized Corpus of 17th- and 18th-Century Sources

Authors: Sangiacomo, Andrea; Tanasescu, Raluca; Donker, Silvia; Hogenbirk, Hugo D.;

Normalisation of Early Modern Science: Digitized Corpus of 17th- and 18th-Century Sources

Abstract

This dataset contains a digitized corpus of early modern natural philosophy works that underlie the European Research Commission-funded Starting Grant “The Normalisation of Natural Philosophy: How Teaching Practices Shaped the Evolution of Early Modern Science,” (grant agreement No. 801653 NaturalPhilosophy), led by Dr. Andrea Sangiacomo at the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Groningen. The methodology we used for the digitization of the present dataset is described in the paper: A. Sangiacomo, H. Hogenbirk, R. Tanasescu, A. Karaisl, N White. 2022. “Reading in the Mist: High-Quality Optical Character Recognition Based on Early Modern Digitized Books.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. https://bit.ly/3vwvwKI The inventory of the present dataset is available at DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5566681 The methodology behind the retrieval, cleaning, and annotation of the above inventory is described in the paper: Sangiacomo, Andrea; Tanasescu, Raluca; Donker, Silvia; Hogenbirk, Hugo. 2021. “Mapping the Evolution of Early Modern Natural Philosophy: Corpus Collection and Authority Acknowledgement,” published in the Annals of Science (DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2021.1992502; permanent link: https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2021.1992502 The dictionaries from which we selected the data in worksheets 2-5 in the inventory are the following: Wiep van Bunge, Henri Krop, Bart Leeuwenburgh, Paul Schuurman, Han van Ruler and Michiel Wielema, Dictionary of Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Dutch Philosophers (London: Bloomsbury, 2003); John Yolton, Valdimir Price and John Stephens. Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British Philosophers (London: Bloomsbury, 1999); Andrew Pyle. Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century British Philosophers (London: Bloomsbury, 2000); Luc Foisneau. Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century French Philosophers (London: Bloomsbury, 2008); Heiner F. Klemme and Manfred Kuehn. Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century Philosophers (London: Bloomsbury, 2011). University of Groningen Team: Andrea Sangiacomo (principal investigator) Raluca Tanasescu (postdoctoral researcher) Silvia Donker and Hugo Hogenbirk (PhD students) Cristian A. Marocico (scientific programmer, Center for Information Technology) Wim Breakman (bibliographer, University of Groningen Library)

Related Organizations
Keywords

natural philosophy, early modern science

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 13
  • 13
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
13