Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Anonymized data set of the ethics of research funding survey. To anonymize the data, the responses to the open comment field (Q57) have been removed. The publication of these anonymized data has been approved by the ethics committee of KU Leuven.
The pilot dataset of this study is at 10.5281/zenodo.6945173
peer review, research integrity, questionable research practices, research funding
peer review, research integrity, questionable research practices, research funding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 22 | |
| downloads | 33 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts