Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

First Experiences in Performance Benchmarking with the New SPEChpc 2021 Suites - Measurement Data

Authors: Holger Brunst; Sunita Chandrasekaran; Florina M. Ciorba; Nick Hagerty; Robert Henschel; Guido Juckeland; Junjie Li; +3 Authors

First Experiences in Performance Benchmarking with the New SPEChpc 2021 Suites - Measurement Data

Abstract

Modern High Performance Computing (HPC) systemsare built with innovative system architectures and novelprogramming models to further push the speed limit of computing.The increased complexity poses challenges for performanceportability and performance evaluation. The Standard PerformanceEvaluation Corporation (SPEC) has a long history ofproducing industry-standard benchmarks for modern computersystems. SPEC’s newly released SPEChpc 2021 benchmark suites,developed by the High Performance Group, are a bold attempt toprovide a fair and objective benchmarking tool designed for state-HPC, SPEC, HPG, SPEChpc 2021, benchmarks,performance benchmarking and analysis, heterogeneity, offloading,MPI, MPI+X, OpenMP, OpenACCof-the-art HPC systems. With the support of multiple host andaccelerator programming models, the suites are portable acrossboth homogeneous and heterogeneous architectures. Differentworkloads are developed to fit system sizes ranging from a fewcompute nodes to a few hundred compute nodes. In this work wepresent our first experiences in performance benchmarking thenew SPEChpc2021 suites and evaluate their portability and basicperformance characteristics on various popular and emergingHPC architectures, including x86 CPU, NVIDIA GPU, and AMDGPU. This study provides a first-hand experience of executingthe SPEChpc 2021 suites at scale on production HPC systems,discusses real-world use cases, and serves as an initial guidelinefor using the benchmark suites This deposit contains all measurement data for the results shown in the paper as well as all platform setups (compilers and flags) and also the errors encountered on the exascale test system "Spock".

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 27
    download downloads 41
  • 27
    views
    41
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
27
41
Related to Research communities