Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The Natural & Ultra-Processed Foods (NUPF) database includes 40 images of food stimuli photographed on a grey background. Twenty images depict a natural food item (such as an apple) or lightly processed item (such as cheese) and twenty images depict an ultra-processed item (e.g., a chocolate bar). Ratings were obtained from two sets of participants. The first group (n = 70) rated the stimuli on approachability (approach/avoid), desirability, popularity, and healthiness. The second group (n = 90) rated the same items on valence, arousal, and recognizability. Participant details can be found in Table 1 (which can be found in the NUPFdatabase.zip). Natural foods are typically considered healthier than ultra-processed foods, therefore tentative category labels regarding healthiness are included as well. The NUPF database includes the minimum, maximum, and mean ratings per food item. Also information regarding the weight of the portion, calories per portion, and calorie density (calories per 100 or 1 gram) are included. The NUPFdatabase.zip includes: - 40 High resolution images (divided into healthy and unhealthy categories) - 40 low resolution (websize) images (divided into healthy and unhealthy categories) - Mean ratings on valence, arousal, approach/avoid, desirability, popularity, perceived healthiness, and recognizability - Table 1 with details regarding the raters (i.e., participants who rated the images) - A readme file regarding info about the rating file
food stimuli; database; arousal; valence; approach/avoid; desirability; images; pictures; recognizability
food stimuli; database; arousal; valence; approach/avoid; desirability; images; pictures; recognizability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 46 | |
| downloads | 12 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts