Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.7...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.7802/1224...
Dataset . 2016
Data sources: Sygma
https://dx.doi.org/10.7802/122...
Dataset . 2016
Data sources: Datacite
B2FIND
Dataset . 2016
Data sources: B2FIND
CESSDA Data Catalogue
Dataset . 2016
Data sources: CESSDA Data Catalogue
 View all 5 versions
Claim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

EconBizRecSys evaluation result

Research datakeyboard_double_arrow_right Dataset 01 Jan 2016Publisher:GESIS Data ArchiveFunded by:EC | MOVING
Authors: Nishioka, Chifumi; Nishioka, Chifumi; Scherp, Ansgar; Scherp, Ansgar;

doi: 10.7802/1224

EconBizRecSys evaluation result

Abstract

This is the evaluation result from the experiment of the paper: C. Nishioka and A. Scherp "Profiling vs. Time vs. Content: What does Matter for Top-k Publication Recommendation based on Twitter Profiles?", JCDL, 2016. The paper reported the experiment of the scientific publication recommender system. The dataset contains evaluations of the recommended scientific publications made by anonymized 123 participants in the experiment.

This is the evaluation result from the experiment of the paper: C. Nishioka and A. Scherp "Profiling vs. Time vs. Content: What does Matter for Top-k Publication Recommendation based on Twitter Profiles?", JCDL, 2016. The paper reported the experiment of the scientific publication recommender system. The dataset contains evaluations of the recommended scientific publications made by anonymized 123 participants in the experiment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

KAT56 University, Research, Social Sciences, University, Research, the Sciences, the Sciences, KAT56 University, Research, the Sciences

EOSC Subjects

Twitter Data

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 9
  • 9
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
9
Funded by