
How transcription factor dimerization impacts DNA-binding specificity is poorly understood. Guided by protein dimerization properties, we examined DNA binding specificities of 270 human bZIP pairs. DNA interactomes of 80 heterodimers and 22 homodimers revealed that 72% of heterodimer motifs correspond to conjoined half-sites preferred by partnering monomers. Remarkably, the remaining motifs are composed of variably-spaced half-sites (12%) or ‘emergent’ sites (16%) that cannot be readily inferred from half-site preferences of partnering monomers. These binding sites were biochemically validated by EMSA-FRET analysis and validated in vivo by ChIP-seq data from human cell lines. Focusing on ATF3, we observed distinct cognate site preferences conferred by different bZIP partners, and demonstrated that genome-wide binding of ATF3 is best explained by considering many dimers in which it participates. Importantly, our compendium of bZIP-DNA interactomes predicted bZIP binding to 156 disease associated SNPs, of which only 20 were previously annotated with known bZIP motifs.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, QH301-705.5, Science, sequence specificity landscapes, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Substrate Specificity, transcription factors, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Humans, Biology (General), SELEX, genetic variants, Q, R, Nuclear Proteins, RNA-Binding Proteins, protein-DNA interactions, DNA, Medicine, Protein Multimerization, gene regulation, Computational and Systems Biology, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, QH301-705.5, Science, sequence specificity landscapes, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Substrate Specificity, transcription factors, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Humans, Biology (General), SELEX, genetic variants, Q, R, Nuclear Proteins, RNA-Binding Proteins, protein-DNA interactions, DNA, Medicine, Protein Multimerization, gene regulation, Computational and Systems Biology, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 113 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
