
handle: 11568/1317670
Industrial process monitoring can benefit from utilizing historical data, providing insights for decision-making and operational efficiency. This study develops a soft-sensor-based approach leveraging multi-fidelity modeling to correct discrepancies between online sensors and laboratory analyses. A Gaussian process-based strategy is used to predict deviations between high-frequency low-fidelity sensor data and less frequent high-fidelity laboratory measurements. By exploring static and dynamic modeling frameworks, we assess their suitability for capturing process dynamics and addressing time-dependent variability. The multi-fidelity soft sensor noticeably improves predictive accuracy, outperforming high-fidelity and low-fidelity methods. This approach demonstrates applicability across various industrial settings where integrating diverse data sources enhances real-time process control and monitoring, reducing reliance on costly laboratory sampling.
Industry 4.0, Information Management, Machine Learning, Modelling, Process Monitoring
Industry 4.0, Information Management, Machine Learning, Modelling, Process Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
