Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
Journal of Medical Education Development
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The effect of near-peer-assisted learning on self-efficacy and clinical performance of undergraduate nursing students during clinical internship: A quasi-experimental study

Authors: Zohreh Badiyepeymaiejahromi; Mohsen Faselehjahromi; Sasan Rahmanian; Mohsen Hojat;

The effect of near-peer-assisted learning on self-efficacy and clinical performance of undergraduate nursing students during clinical internship: A quasi-experimental study

Abstract

Background & Objective: Traditional clinical education methods have not been effective in improving students' clinical performance. Implementing near-peer assisted learning could help address many of the challenges nursing students encounter in their pursuit of effective learning.This study aims to determine the effect of near-peer-assisted learning on self-efficacy and clinical performance of nursing students during clinical internships. Materials & Methods: This study utilized a quasi-experimental design with a post-test control group. The statistical population included all nursing students participating in clinical internships at Jahrom University of Medical Sciences from 2021 to 2023, totaling 93 students selected through a census method. The intervention group, comprised of 52 students, participated in near-peer assisted learning, while the control group of 41 students received traditional instruction from university instructors. Students' self-efficacy was evaluated using the standard self-efficacy in the clinical performance questionnaire; thus, clinical performance was assessed using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores at the end of each period. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22, the t-test for mean score comparisons, and Chi-square test for qualitative data. Results: The mean self-efficacy scores were 139.16 ± 0.57 and 109.65 ± 0.89 for the intervention and control groups in post-test, respectively. The mean OSCE scores were 5.09 ± 0.29 and 4.85 ± 0.76 for the intervention and control in post-test. The independent t-test revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean self-efficacy scores between the two groups (p < 0.001, Effect Size = 0.95). However, no significant difference was found in the mean OSCE scores between the groups (p = 0.061, Effect Size = 0.43). Conclusion: The near-peer assisted learning method has a more significant impact on the self-efficacy of nursing students during clinical internships compared to traditional teaching methods. Furthermore, this approach can be as effective as instructor-led training in enhancing students' clinical performance. Therefore, it is recommended to integrate this method with other educational approaches to further improve clinical performance among nursing students.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Green