Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.6071/m39w8v
We gathered the citation information for all PLOS ONE articles, indexed by A, from the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection. From this data we obtained a master list of the unique digital object identifier, DOIA and the number of citations, cA, at the time of the data download (census) date (a) For the pre-print this corresponds to December 3, 2016; (b) and for the final published article this corresponds to February 25, 2019. We then used each DOIA to access the corresponding online XML version of each article at PLOS ONE by visiting the unique web address “http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=” + “DOIA”. After parsing the full-text XML (primarily the author byline data and reference list), we merged the PLOS ONE publication information and WOS citation data by matching on DOIA. #allofplos: PLOS has since made all full-text XML data freely available: https://www.plos.org/text-and-data-mining ; this option was not available at the moment of our data collection.
Merged PLOS ONE and Web of Science data compiled in .dta files produced by STATA13. Included is a Do-file for reproducing the regression model estimates reported in the pre-print (Tables I and II) and published version (Table 1). Each observation (.dta line) corresponds to a given PLOS ONE article, with various article-level and editor-level characteristics used as explanatory and control variables. This summary provides a brief description of each variable and its source. If you use this data, please cite: A. M. Petersen. Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE. Journal of Informetrics 13, 100974 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2019.100974
Data enclosed in a single zipped folder: A) DASH-V2 : Data files for final published analysis (J. Informetrics, 2019) File A1: PubData_DOI_141986_Nc_0_2019.dta File A2: PubData_DOI_141986_Nc_0_2019_DOFILE B) DASH-V1 : Data files for preprint version (https://ssrn.com/abstract=2901272) File B1: PubData_Obs_102741_Nc_10_No2015_CitationsAnalysis.dta File B2: PubData_Obs_128734_Nc_10_AcceptanceTimeAnalysis.dta File B3: STATA13_DOFILE C) Data description common to all .dta files, which contain parsed and merged PLOS ONE and Web of Science metadata: File A3: UC-DASH_DataDescription_Petersen_V2.pdf File B4: UC-DASH_DataDescription_Petersen_V1.pdf
science of science, Bibliometrics, perverse incentives, biases, self-citation, human analytics, editorial boards
science of science, Bibliometrics, perverse incentives, biases, self-citation, human analytics, editorial boards
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 56 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts