Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in MANETs

Authors: Rayi Surekha; Aravabhumi Divya; B. Malakonda Reddy; Maruboina Sravani;

Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in MANETs

Abstract

Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) represent a dynamic and infrastructure-less network paradigm, where efficient and reliable routing is crucial due to frequent topology changes and resource constraints. This paper presents a comprehensive performance analysis of five widely used MANET routing protocols—AODV, DSR, DSDV, OLSR, and ZRP—under varying network conditions. Using NS-2.35 as the simulation environment, the study evaluates these protocols based on key Quality of Service (QoS) metrics including packet delivery ratio (PDR), end-to-end delay, throughput, routing overhead, packet loss ratio (PLR), and energy consumption. The results demonstrate that AODV and OLSR offer superior performance in terms of delivery and throughput, while DSR is favorable for energy-constrained applications. DSDV and ZRP show moderate performance with limitations under specific scenarios. The analysis underscores the need for protocol selection based on application requirements and highlights the potential of integrating trust-aware and intelligent routing enhancements in future research.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green