
S. R. Ranganathan formulated several rules and guidelines for classification and cataloguing, and normative principles are one among them. The present study aims to develop an ontology on normative principles (NorPOnt) so that it will improve data connection, knowledge representation, and search strategies. Protégé software was utilised to develop the ontology and the built-in Pellet Reasoner Plug-in was used to investigate for inconsistencies and found none. Competency questions (CQs) were created to measure the satisfaction level of select experts in using the ontology. The mean satisfactory level was found to be 3.24, which indicates that satisfactory and highly satisfactory were the two most common responses. The ontology’s quality was also assessed using the FOCA method. After the computation, the quality value (µ) was discovered to be 0.992, which is near 1, signifying excellent quality. The evaluation results show that NorPOnt is an ontology with few inconsistencies and could answer the CQs better with higher quality.
Ontology, Normative Principles, S.R. Ranganathan, Competency Questions (CQs), FOCA Methodology.
Ontology, Normative Principles, S.R. Ranganathan, Competency Questions (CQs), FOCA Methodology.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
