
FIGURE 2. Morphological comparison between Dioclea rostrata (A–D), M. bicolor (E–H), M. nitidus (I–L) and M. erectus (M–P). Scales: 5 mm. A–D: Wied s.n. (BR-0000005197378), E–H: Snak 939 (HUEFS), I: Pires 16357 (RB), J– L: Lima 8091 (HUEFS), L: upper: Riedel 560 (K-000502901), M: Fraga 3051 (RB), N–P: Fraga 3051 (HUEFS). Photographs Andrés Fonseca-Cortés, except for (BR- 0000005197378 and K-000502901 courtesy of Luis Casas-Restrepo). Elaboration: Andrés Fonseca-Cortés.
Published as part of Fonseca-Cortés, Andrés, Snak, Cristiane & Queiroz, Luciano Paganucci De, 2023, Macropsychanthus nitidus: a new rank and combination for dioclea rostrata var. nitida (leguminosae, papilionoideae), pp. 293-298 in Phytotaxa 619 (4) on page 296, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.619.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/8430575
Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Fabales, Fabaceae, Biodiversity, Plantae, Macropsychanthus, Taxonomy
Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Fabales, Fabaceae, Biodiversity, Plantae, Macropsychanthus, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
