{"references": ["Adewole, A. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of public procurement reforms in curbing corruption in Nigeria. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(3), 328-349.", "Agboola, A. A., & Ofoegbu, G. N. (2021). An analysis of the factors affecting the outcome of public procurement dispute resolution in Nigeria. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1).", "Akenroye, T. O., & Owens, J. D. (2020). Drivers of procurement corruption in public construction projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(1), 252-272.", "Badmus, B. S., Oyewobi, L. O., & Ibrahim, A. D. (2022). An examination of transparency issues in public procurement bidding process in Nigeria. Heliyon, 8(4).", "Ebekozien, A., Ugoani, J. N. N., & Igbokwe, V. C. (2021). Corruption in public procurement: Implications for economic development in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 985-1005.", "Eze, J. C., & Okoye, J. C. (2019). Analysis of Nigeria public procurement amendments using principal component analysis. Cogent Engineering, 6(1).", "Ikpefan, O. A., & Ojeka, S. A. (2021). An examination of transparency in public procurement process in Nigeria. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4).", "Obara, L. C., & Nwankwo, B. E. (2020). Effectiveness of public procurement reform tools in curbing corruption: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(3), 279-294.", "Ogundele, O. J. K., Hassan, A. O., Idris, M. Y., & Aliu, I. R. (2019). Public procurement reforms and accountability of procurement officers in Nigeria. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(4), 359-374.", "Olatunji, O. C. (2022). An appraisal of transparency initiatives in Nigerian public procurement system using principal component analysis. Journal of Public Procurement, 22(1), 78-104."]}

Public procurement is vital for government functioning but prone to disputes and inefficiencies. This study analyzes procurement dispute resolution in Nigeria's court system. Questionnaires were administered to 152 legal experts and procurement stakeholders. Correlation analysis of variables like dispute type, legal framework, agencies, outcomes, costs, corruption, contract size, and location provided insights into relationships. Findings show reforms have not significantly improved transparency or reduced corruption. Dispute resolution remains constrained by lack of enforcement, delays, costs, and negative public perception. A multidimensional approach is imperative to strengthen the process through better adherence to laws, training, technology adoption, judiciary funding, alternative dispute resolution, and continuous review of policies.