Downloads provided by UsageCounts
DataCite, ORCID, and Crossref as international open scholarly infrastructure are adopted globally, but in APAC, national level PID providers also share the vision and work with their respective local communities to build services and tools to help them achieve data management goals. We are spoiled by the thriving PIDs ecosystem with PIDs for different types of entities, different levels of technical interoperability, different governance model, different user community, etc. - When the time comes to build an optimal PID integration or adoption strategy, how should one navigate the landscape? Join the continued conversation in the Better Together APAC webinar series to dive into the topic of working with multiple PIDs, hear from DataCite, Crossref and ORCID, as well as organizations that have already built and implemented strategies that synergize the strength of different PIDs to provide their communities with the flexibility to meet varied use cases, making them truly better, together. Speakers: Multi-identifiers on Science Data Bank – Lulu Jiang, SciDB, CNIC Japan Link Center with PID connection - DOI Registration Agency of Japan, but MORE – Yoshiro Hirao, JaLC ROR IDs in Crossref metadata – Fabienne Michaud, Product Manager, Crossref Better together: working with multiple PIDs – Crossref x ORCID – Lena Stoll, Product Manager, Crossref Navigating the PIDs Landscape, Advancing Knowledge – Xiaoli Chen, Project Lead, DataCite Shine Together: ORCID and PIDs In a Row – Estelle Cheng, Engagement Manager, ORCID A recording of this webinar can be found here: https://youtu.be/onqixryUXcU
DOI, Open Infrastructure, Persistent Identifiers, JALC, Digital Object Identifier, PID, Crossref, Chinese Academy of Sciences, DataCite, ORCID
DOI, Open Infrastructure, Persistent Identifiers, JALC, Digital Object Identifier, PID, Crossref, Chinese Academy of Sciences, DataCite, ORCID
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 28 | |
| downloads | 29 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts