Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Interface of Governance: Assessing the Design of Civic Apps in Indian Cities

Authors: Anushka Gokhale; Archit Dubey; Bianca Shah; Phani Datta Surampudi;

The Interface of Governance: Assessing the Design of Civic Apps in Indian Cities

Abstract

It is estimated that 71% of India's population owns a smartphone in 2023. This rapid adoption, coupled with India's Digital India initiative, has led to a surge in governance through mobile applications or m-governance, aiming to bring civic services to citizens' fingertips. The centrally-sponsored Smart Cities Mission aims to find smart solutions to urban development, but there are challenges in meeting the objectives of good governance like efficiency, effectiveness, and citizen participation due to flaws in the product development cycle and user experience (UX). This study aims to critically analyze the m-governance tools provided by selected Indian cities to assess design, quality, inclusivity, and overall citizen experience by examining: The possibility and potential of an open design environment to ensure standardization across these applications. The basic standards, guidelines and quality parameters followed by Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) for developing efficient m-governance applications The m-governance apps are efficient and usable ensuring a positive citizen experience regardless of digital literacy. This study aims to assess the different mobile applications provided by select 3 to 5 cities in India, based on their design, development, quality and range of services provided, and inclusivity and accessibility of these applications to assess the overall experience provided to the citizens. A design-thinking (DT) approach has the potential to strengthen collaborative structures in smart cities and thus aid in building resilient urban systems. This is because the principles of DT, such as radical collaboration, experimentation, prototyping and iterative design, align with the citizen-centered, problem-solving perspective of collaborative innovation, which is the underlying objective of Smart Cities Mission. Hence, for this study, we would adopt an interdisciplinary approach by leveraging the design thinking process and thus conduct the following activities to assess the m-governance tools provided by the selected ULBs: UX Audit - analyzing the products and services and the experience they offer to citizens based on tenets to identify shortfalls pertaining to branding, ease of first use, navigation, usage of normalized patterns, ethical design, feedback loops, system statuses, grievance redressal, contextual help, task lifecycle, and range and quality of available micro-services. This assessment will help gauge inclusivity and accessibility for both, digital natives and digital immigrants. Generalisation & Standardisation - identifying opportunities to establish certain standards that can be followed to make the ecosystem of apps seem cohesive and interconnected. Identifying Global Benchmarks - identifying standards, guidelines or best practices followed by other countries worldwide and learning from them. The objective of this study is to formulate recommendations for government bodies to create better m-governance tools to facilitate urban development. The findings of this study would be of interest and importance to any government or private institutions that are eager to transform cities by improving or developing m-governance tools.

Keywords

design-thinking, open design environment, urban governance, ILUS 2023, m-governance, civic design

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 4
  • 6
    views
    4
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
4
Green