Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The dataset released here has been used in our paper "#Bigbirds Never Die: Understanding Social Dynamics of Emergent Hashtags." [link to the paper](https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM13/paper/view/6083/6376) In this study, we examine the growth, survival, and context of over 250 novel hashtags during the 2012 U.S. presidential debates. Our analysis reveals the trajectories of hashtag use fall into two distinct classes: "winners" that emerge more quickly and are sustained for longer periods of time than other "also-rans" hashtags. Statistical analyses of the growth and persistence of hashtags reveal novel relationships between the hashtags' contextual features and the relative success of hashtags. This is the first study on the lifecycle of hashtag adoption and use in response to purely exogenous shocks, which has implications for understanding social influence and collective action in social media more generally. The dataset was the hashtag adoption time sequences during the four debates. They are used to create **Figure 1** in the paper (Cumulative tweet volume of hashtags over time, starting from each debate). Each csv file has three columns: time (in UTC), y (the minute-by-minute cumulative tweet count), and tag (the hashtag name). The onset of the four debates are: Debate 1: 2012-10-04 00:00:00 UTC Debate 2: 2012-10-12 00:00:00 UTC Debate 3: 2012-10-17 00:00:00 UTC Debate 4: 2012-10-23 00:00:00 UTC The raw tweet data have been released via the ICWSM Data Sharing Service. See: [http://www.icwsm.org/2013/datasets/datasets/](http://www.icwsm.org/2013/datasets/datasets/) Publication If you make use of these data sets and code, please cite: Lin, Y.-R., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., Baronchelli, A., Lazer, D. (2013). #Bigbirds Never Die: Understanding Social Dynamics of Emergent Hashtags. In Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2013)
hashtag adoption
hashtag adoption
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 17 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts