Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Wind spacecraft floating potential measurements

Authors: Wilson III, Lynn B.; Salem, Chadi S.; Bonnell, John W.;

Wind spacecraft floating potential measurements

Abstract

Quick Summary: The ASCII files herein are a dataset of spacecraft electric potential for the Wind spacecraft between January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2022. The data is thoroughly described in the publication "Spacecraft floating potential measurements for the Wind spacecraft," The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. Wind Spacecraft: The Wind spacecraft (https://wind.nasa.gov and https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000714) was launched on November 1, 1994 and currently is in a halo orbit about the first Sun-Earth Lagrange point. It holds a suite of instruments from gamma ray detectors to quasi-static magnetic field instruments, Bo. The instruments used in this study and these datasets are the fluxgate magnetometer (MFI), the radio receivers (WAVES), ion Faraday cups (SWE), and the electron and ion electrostatic analyzers (3DP). The MFI measures 3-vector Bo at ~11 samples per second (sps); the SWE measures reduced velocity distribution functions (VDFs) of the thermal proton and alpha-particle populations from which velocity moments are derived and used herein; WAVES observes electromagnetic radiation from ~4 kHz to >12 MHz which provides an observation of the upper hybrid line (also called the plasma line) used to define the total electron density; and 3DP observes full 4π steradian VDFs of electrons and ions from a few eV to ~30 keV which provide both ion velocity moments and the electron VDFs modeled herein. Brief Method Description: The spacecraft potential, \(\phi_{sc}\), was found using four methods. Three of these methods return a range of values while the fourth returns a single value. The methods rely on examining the shape of the electron energy distribution function (EDF), f(E) versus energy, E, for three different pitch-angles (parallel, perpendicular, and anti-parallel with respect to the quasi-static magnetic field, Bo). The instrument has a physical lower energy threshold, Emin, below which no data are measured. We impose an upper energy threshold, Emax, allowed when searching for \(\phi_{sc}\) based on empirical evidence. The methods are as follows: Method 1: find the range of energies where d2f/dE2 > 0, also referred to as the positive curvature region; Method 2: find the range of energies where df/dE transitions from negative to positive, i.e., the local minimum point of f(E); Method 3: find the range of energies bounding the minimum and maximum values of d2f/dE2, i.e., region of minimum to maximum curvature; and Method 4: find the local minimum between Emin and Emax There are some additional constraints imposed in the software, available at https://github.com/lynnbwilsoniii/wind_3dp_pros (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6141586). We found four basic shapes for the EDFs (see paper for example figures), two (i.e., Types A and B) of which satisfy Emin < \(\phi_{sc}\) and thus are good. The other two shapes (i.e., Types C1 and C2) satisfy Emin > \(\phi_{sc}\), and thus we cannot determine \(\phi_{sc}\) from the EDF. We can only know that it has an upper bound of Emin. All Type A EDFs are given a quality flag (QF) of 4 (i.e., the best), all Type Bs are given a QF of 2 (i.e., still okay and useable), and all Type Cs are given a QF of 0 (i.e., do not use these). ASCII File Description: Each ASCII file contains one year of data. There is summary information contained in the header of each file. The first two columns are the start and end times (UTC) of the EDF (format 'YYYY-MM-DD/hh:mm:ss.xxx'). After the times, Methods 1-3 have six columns and Method 4 has three columns. The first(second) three columns for Methods 1-3 correspond to the lower(upper) bound on the range of \(\phi_{sc}\) [eV] solutions. Method 4 only has one set of three-column solutions. Each three-column set corresponds to the parallel, perpendicular, and anti-parallel pitch-angle solutions. All of these in total comprise 21 columns. The \(\phi_{sc}\) solutions are followed by a column for Emin [eV] and Emax [eV]. The last two columns are the EDF label or type (i.e., A, B, C1, or C2) and the quality flag (i.e., 4, 2, or 0). Note that NaNs have been replaced with -1030 fill values

{"references": ["10.1029/2020RG000714"]}

Keywords

Wind spacecraft, solar wind, particle velocity distribution functions, spacecraft floating potential

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
  • 6
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
4
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
6