Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The #BTW17 Twitter Dataset - Recorded Tweets of the Federal Election Campaigns of 2017 for the 19th German Bundestag

Authors: Kratzke, Nane;

The #BTW17 Twitter Dataset - Recorded Tweets of the Federal Election Campaigns of 2017 for the 19th German Bundestag

Abstract

The German Bundestag elections are the most important democratic elections of Germany. This dataset comprises Twitter interactions related with German politicians of the most important political parties over several months in the (pre-)phase of the German election campaigns in 2017. The Twitter accounts of 364 politicians (that is approximately half of the German parliament, the German Bundestag) were followed for almost half a year. The collected data comprise of about 10 GB of Twitter raw data generated by more than 120.000 active Twitter users generating more than 1.200.000 tweets during the pre- and hot-phase of the election campaigns for the 19th German Bundestag. The dataset can be used to study how political parties, their followers and supporters make use of social media channels like Twitter in the context of political election campaigns and what kind of content is shared. The following files contain relevant context information: crawled-pages.json contains the URLs of the official party faction websites of the 18th German Bundestag that were crawled to identify the Twitter screennames of German politicians of all Bundestag factions. Because the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) and the Freie Demokratische Partei (FDP) were not part of the 18th German Bundestag (but it was likely that they will enter the 19th German Bundestag) other official websites were selected to crawl for relevant and representative politicians for these both parties (in case of the AfD this was the website of the directorate of the AfD federal party and the list of members of the European Parliament, in case of the FDP this was the website of the executive committee of the FDP federal party of Germany). followed-accounts.json contains the (manually checked and edited) crawling result of 327 Twitter screennames of politicians that have been observed via the Twitter streaming API to collect this dataset.

Funded via general support for research by Lübeck University of Applied Sciences.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Twitter, politics, election campaign, federal election, German Bundestag, 2017, 19th German Bundestag, dataset, german, natural language processing, NLP

EOSC Subjects

Twitter Data

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 130
    download downloads 52
  • 130
    views
    52
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
130
52
Related to Research communities