Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Interdisciplinary collaboration and integration of large and diverse datasets are becoming increasingly important. Answering complex research questions requires combining and analysing multimodal datasets. Research data management follows the FAIR principles making data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. However, there are challenges in capturing the entire research cycle and contextualizing data according, not only for the DataPLANT and NFDI4BIOIMAGE communities. To address these challenges, DataPLANT developed a data structure called Annotated Research Context (ARC). The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) originated from the neuroimaging community extended for microscopic image data. Both concepts provide standardised and file system based data storage structures for organising and sharing research data accompanied with metadata. We exemplarily compare the ARC and BIDS designs and propose structural and metadata mapping.
NFDI4BIOIMAGE, Brain Imaging Data Structure, Metadata, Microscopy, Data Packaging, Data Publishing, Plant Science, ARC, DataPLANT, Reproducibility, BIDS, NFDI, Metadata Mapping, NFDI4Plants, Linked Data, Annotated Research Context, Multimodal Data, Bio Imaging, Research Object, FAIR, Data Management
NFDI4BIOIMAGE, Brain Imaging Data Structure, Metadata, Microscopy, Data Packaging, Data Publishing, Plant Science, ARC, DataPLANT, Reproducibility, BIDS, NFDI, Metadata Mapping, NFDI4Plants, Linked Data, Annotated Research Context, Multimodal Data, Bio Imaging, Research Object, FAIR, Data Management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 43 | |
| downloads | 29 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts