This article strives to reveal the dialogic, that is, antagonistic-complementary nature of transmethodology, based on the initial contributions of transdisciplinarity in the work of Basarab Nicolescu. Thus, the transmethods are transmethodological bets that do not agree with a single discipline and its methods, and rather than gather or convene different methods, they strive —from a horizon of complexity— to put them in dialogue from different perspectives of meaning, which is usually visible between, through and beyond research findings, discourses and narratives. To achieve this, they require the religaré between three elements that move and interact in a pendulous- triangulated way: transdisciplinarity, complexity and decoloniality, which are embedded and shape non-linear ways of understanding processes, methods, methodologies and techniques. investigative, thus promoting a rupture of the matrix that compartmentalizes knowledge and explanatory perspectives, while broadening its understanding from an integrative, relational and rhizomatic position.