
This piece is a follow-up on a pedagogical exercise called the “reverse research design” (Ayoub 2022). As a teaching tool, the reverse research design involves students stepping into the shoes of a published author and transporting themselves back in time to craft a grant proposal for an already-concluded study. This hands-on exercise guides them through the intricacies of research design while temporarily easing the anxiety of formulating their own research question and project. At the request of the QMMR editors, we restate the goals of the original exercise but also build upon it by developing additional strategies for productive use in the classroom. To that end, it is vital to incorporate student viewpoints and feedback, which we do below by uniting the perspective of a student (Duckworth) and an instructor (Ayoub). Our endeavor is thus to offer a more personal reflection about our experiences with this activity, coupled with a discussion of wider student feedback.
Qualitative Methods
Qualitative Methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
