Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

2023 IEEE SPS Video and Image Processing (VIP) Cup: Ophthalmic Biomarker Detection Phase 2

Authors: Ghassan AlRegib; Mohit Prabhushankar; Prithwijit Chowdhury; Zoe Fowler; Kiran Kokilepersaud;

2023 IEEE SPS Video and Image Processing (VIP) Cup: Ophthalmic Biomarker Detection Phase 2

Abstract

Ophthalmic clinical trials that study treatment efficacy of eye diseases are performed with a specific purpose and a set of procedures that are predetermined before trial initiation. Hence, they result in a controlled data collection process with gradual changes in the state of a diseased eye. In general, these data include 1D clinical measurements and 3D optical coherence tomography (OCT) imagery. Physicians interpret structural biomarkers for every patient using the 3D OCT images and clinical measurements to make personalized decisions for every patient. Two main challenges in medical image processing has been generalization and personalization. Generalization aims to develop algorithms that work well across diverse patients and scenarios, providing standardized and widely applicable solutions. Personalization, in contrast, tailors algorithms to individual patients based on their unique characteristics, optimizing diagnosis and treatment planning. Generalization offers broad applicability but may overlook individual variations. Personalization provides tailored solutions but requires patient-specific data. While deep learning has shown an affinity towards generalization, it is lacking in personalization. The presence and absence of biomarkers is a personalization challenge rather than a generalization challenge. The variation within OCT scans of patients between visits can be minimal while the difference in manifestation of the same disease across patients may be substantial. The domain difference between OCT scans can arise due to pathology manifestation across patients, clinical labels, and the visit along the treatment process when the scan is taken. Morphological, texture, statistical and fuzzy image processing techniques through adaptive thresholds and preprocessing may prove substantial to overcome these fine-grained challenges. This challenge provides the data and application to address personalization. These files constitute the second phase of the VIP CUP 2023 Challenge at ICIP 2023. This test set has a more general patient base than the first one and as such is a better indicator of the performance of models. This test set was created by taking a subset of the data from a publicly available OCT dataset and then asking our medical partners to provide fine-grained biomarker labels for the competition. We provide the citation for the source of these images below: Kermany D, Goldbaum M, Cai W et al. Identifying Medical Diagnoses and Treatable Diseases by Image-Based Deep Learning. Cell. 2018; 172(5):1122-1131. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.010. This zenodo repository contains the images and submission template file needed for the second phase of the competition.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 182
    download downloads 66
  • 182
    views
    66
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
182
66
Related to Research communities